if the sight of a jew doing culturally jewish things and/or practicing the religion makes a person go 𫵠POTENTIAL EVIL LYING CHILD KILLING ZIONIST, APPROACH WITH CAUTION𫵠they are already antisemitic. and itās going to take a lot of research and self-reckoning and uhh talking to jews in good faith for them to come back from that mindset. and many wonāt undergo that process because itās uncomfortable and shame-producing. and i honestly canāt show grace to folks who have unknowingly fallen down that rabbit hole because the conflation of ājewishā with āevil and badā has already gotten jews killed this year. and itās gotten jews killed for thousands of years. and unless gentiles start unpacking that long-ingrained cultural assumption that Jew = Suspicious, Probably Evil, Destroy Now weāll see more pogroms in the future.
and before you come into my mentions with ābut israel,ā please understand that gentiles have never needed proof to believe jews are evil and murder them. right now, antisemites are gleeful that they have a āreasonā and too many of yāall are just following their lead because you refuse to engage with this information. because youāre not an antisemite, right? you just hate zionists, not jews. and you definitely know what zionism is and you definitely can surmise when zionist is being used as a dogwhistle. right! of course! there is no historical precedent that would lead me to not believe a single word you say.
so like. if you truly want to help fight antisemitism, you have to engage with these ideas even if the process is uncomfortable and shame-producing. you have to unlearn 2,000 years of lies about us and the deeply ingrained instinct to believe we are evil. idk why iām making this post i just wish gentiles would be believe us when we say Itās Really That Fucking Dire.
Hi :) Could I have the source for "wherever Arthur walks, plants die"? That's very "Holly King" coded of him
Sure thing! It's from Triad 23 in the Red Book of Hergest. Here's a translation by John RhÅ·s and John Gwenogvryn Evans:
Three Red Ravagers of the Island of Britain: Rhun son of Beli, and Lleu Skilful Hand, and Morgant the Wealthy. But there was one who was a Red Ravager greater than all three: Arthur was his name. For a year neither grass nor plants used to spring up where one of the three would walk; but where Arthur went, not for seven years.
Peniarth MS 54 lists "{t}hree red-spotted ones of the Island of Prydain. Arthur; and Run son of Beli; and Morgant Mwynfawr" (W.F. Skene's translation), which probably means the same thing, since both include Arthur, Rhun son of Beli, and someone named Morgant. In Welsh, "Morgant the Wealthy" is Morgant Hael, and I haven't been able to determine whether he and Morgant Myfanwyr are the same person.
Thanks for the ask!
Apparently, Camelot of Staten Island Inc. is a branch of a counseling service for people whose lives have been impacted by addictions, either their own or their loved onesā. I would say that some of the people of Arthurian Camelot could have used the services of their Staten Island counterparts were it not that the reviews are very few and several are terrible. I have no more intention of finding out whether Googleās exclusively one-star reviews are accurate than I have an understanding of why someone chose to name a street Arthur Kill Road.
Kwame: Earth!
Wheeler: Fire!
Linka: Wind!
Gi: Water!
Kwame: Uh, didnāt we forget someone?
It is too late. They watch in confusion as a figure in antiquated armor rises from the ground.
Kay: With your powers combined, I am Sir Kay!
Linka: Who are you?
Kay: I am one who may endure Fire and Water like no other and grow as tall as the treetops.
Gi: We were trying to summon Captain Planet. Not that weāre not glad to see you. Um. Will you still fight with us?
Kay: Yes, but I will complain constantly and bully the younger ones.
Kwame: Heart. We forgot Heart. HOW ON EARTH DID WE FORGET HEART?!?
A few hours laterā¦
Wheeler: Has it ever occurred to you that youāre a jerk?
Kay: Has it ever occurred to you that youāre me?
At one point, Dagbert describes his curse by saying that in his thirteenth year, the firstborn son of āthe Lord Grimwaldā must kill or be killed by his father, which suggests that, if the character referred to as Lord Grimwald has multiple names, the title Lord Grimwald is the most official, the one he most favors, or the one which is most closely linked to his identity. Regardless, itās a hereditary title, which means that, by the end, Dagbert is the Lord Grimwald and has his own castle. (This is never additionally ).
From the way Dagbert and Lord Grimwald describe it, it sounds like they started calling Dagbert āDagbert Endlessā for the heck of it. It would be very cool if his many names came from his motherāthere is so much untapped potential that comes with the half-mermaid thingāand it would also make sense if Dagbertās many names were a necessity. If he keeps committing murder/magical manslaughter (depending on how much control heās in), he might be a wanted criminal under some name(s) and need aliases.
Dagbert having endless surnames but Lord Grimwald only having "Grimwald" implies Dagbert either inherited his many surnames from his mother, or Lord Grimwald also has many surnames but managed to pick one. If they're from his mother, it implies that mermaids all have long names. If they're from his father, then I think it's safe to say that a man who chose the name "Grimwald" is likely to be the idiot who decided to name a baby "Dagbert". In this essay I will
Propaganda:
I generally interpret Galahad as aroace. That being said, if he wasnāt and Galadred were a thing, I think it could save the Round Table. Being in a relationship might stop Galahad from going on the Grail quest, which would stop a great number of people from dying, and having a very Catholic boyfriend might stop Mordred from participating in some of his more dubious hobbies, like plotting murder.
Those are fabulous. Iāll add an old and terrible meta-theory and expand on it to apply it to Grimwald:
The whole series was a dream Billy Raven had or took place in his imagination as a way of coping with his terrible circumstances. Lord Grimwald symbolized Harold Bloor. He was never a real person, or, if he was, he only visited Bloorās once.
I am a truther for a lot of things, but my biggest truth is that Dagbert is agender. Why? If Lord Grimwald had no first son, then Lysander could kill him all day every day no problem. He/They Dagbert who doesn't identify as a man or son or boy but actually just doesn't care
(Source: Pa Gur yv y Porthaur)
Here is the excerpt portraying the hero Cai ap Cynyr, later known as Sir Kay, defeating the dreaded monster, Cath Palug (meaning "Palug's Cat" or "Clawing Cat").
And it's a pretty fearsome beast - over 180 in a single night died to it before Kay came to kill it himself. But reviewing it for a bit I noticed the translation says "Nine Score Chieftains" and I thought "wait does this mean a hundred and eighty war leaders and not simply champions? Does that mean Cath Palug also killed their retinues?".
In the history of Welsh Warfare, the Teulu (meaning "family"), was an important and primary element of Military power, being the personal household guard under the patronage of a Welsh lord. The size of these Teulu warbands, depending on the wealth of a chief, could range anywhere from 50 to 120 warriors. (Llywellyn ap Gryffyd had a teulu of 160 men)
So, I took a close look at the original Welsh text:
...and identified the words being translated are "kinlluc" and "kinran"
Afterwards, I went over to the online Geiriadur Prifysgol Cymru/A Dictionary of the Welsh Language (HERE) to clarify their meaning:
So yes, the poem is referring to 180 war leaders getting slaughtered overnight by the monster cat. But, the implication here is that, reasonably and common sense-wise, the chieftains brought along their warbands to hunt a wild animal.
This means, if we choose to interpret the poem saying Cath Palug killed both the chiefs AND their teulu (around say a hundred warriors each), then we are looking at anywhere up to 18,000 warriors and their leaders being massacred by Cath Palug in a single night.
Which gives us a sense of scale of how powerful Cath Palug and its slayer, Sir Kay, must have been.
(Probably still not as powerful as Arthur, given his battle with Twrch Trwyth...)
š- Who had your favorite death? (Most resonant/funniest/coolest)
š§- What's Merlin's deal, in your own words?
š¦- What's your favorite creature or creature-related story?
š“- How do you envision Gringolet?
š»- What animal would your favorite character be?
š- What setting/time period would you most like to see a (good) retelling in?
ā- Which character do you think would most easily adapt to modern-day life?
š„«- Which character do you think would crumble like a soda can in a pressure chamber if they had to deal with the day-to-day horrors of modern life?
š- Does Arthur have a flat ass?
š½ļø- What retelling/tale would you most want to see be adapted into a standalone movie?
Alan Leeās illustration of the enchantress in Merlin Dreams by Peter Dickinson
thinking about the atrocious 1970s vampire musical movie produced by beatles drummer ringo starr in which ringo plays merlin the wizard and it's sort of not explained why merlin is even in a vampire movie in the first place
In which I ramble about poetry, Arthuriana, aroace stuff, etc. In theory. In practice, it's almost all Arthuriana.
215 posts