Omg...

Do you even understand that if there were no 'bad guys' and 'bad choices' and 'icky things' in media literally 99.99% of the music, movies, TV shows, books, ect that we have right now would not exist?

All those awesome action movies where its a race against time to save the world from a criminal organisation hellbent on chaos and world domination?

Gone.

The Great Gatsby and his slutty parties and reckless pining?

Gone.

Godzilla?

Gone.

Snoop Dogg and his beloved music?

Gone.

A world wherein we can freely see a young Hugh Dancy sluttily covered in blood and entrenched in a homoerotic, literally consuming love with a DILF-y Mads Mikkelson, also sluttily covered in blood?

Gone.

What would we even be left with? The gripping adventures of a man running from store to store to find the right kind of flour?

"Whhhaaaaahh, I hated this Evil Villain, I wish he wasn't in the movie!"

Good. That means the storytelling did its job. That means the actor played the Evil Villain well. That means the role was properly fulfilled.

That does not mean the Evil Villain shouldn't exist.

➡️ Content warnings on fiction are a courtesy. 

➡️ Not every medium of fiction and storytelling has or is expected to have content warnings or extensive tagging.

➡️ Print novels do not traditionally warn for content in any way.

➡️ Until AO3 came along, fanfiction did not traditionally warn for content in any significant way.

➡️ An author is only obligated to warn for content to the degree mandated by the format they publish their fiction on.

➡️ Content warnings beyond the minimum are a courtesy, not an obligation.

➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is a valid tag that authors are allowed to use on AO3. It means there could be anything in there and you have accepted the risk. 'May contain peanuts!'

➡️ Writers are allowed to use 'Creator chose not to warn' for any reason, including to maintain surprise and avoid spoilers.

➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is not the same thing as 'no archive warnings apply'.

➡️ It is your responsibility to protect yourself and close a book, or hit the back button if you find something in fiction that you're reading that upsets you.

➡️ You are responsible for protecting yourself from fiction that causes you discomfort.

Honestly? Mario jump

yes! i do like [problematic thing]! and unfortunately i am under no obligation to defend my interests to strangers on the internet. good day and thank you for your time

I made this little comic of Mono and Six.

This is one of my theorys on Little Nightmares 2 made into one small comic. Soon I will make my first theory video of Little Nightmares on my youtube channel so.. stay tuned!

It's time for the sebaciel renaissance when the new season drops ✨

Rules, by Antis:

- You cannot romanticize anything bad.

- Anything I decide is romanticizing is romanticizing. Even if you argue otherwise.

- But it's ok if the media I like has a problematic relationship. Because it's not romanticizing, because I said so.

- You cannot age up that character, they are fictional do they'll always be a child.

- You also cannot ship that character, you have to treat them like a real person.

- Characters can't consent and we must protect them.

- Proshippers (real humans) we can treat poorly though.

- Proshippers are sexual harassers.

- But also, we can speculate about what their kinks are and if they have paraphilias or other fetish disorders.

- Cancel culture is totally cool.

- Don't cancel me for harassing proshippers though because it's okay when I do it.

I don’t wanna get too into fandom discourse but this is the funniest, most embarrassing shit I’ve ever read lmao

Just kids bein’ kids

youtube link