Rules, by Antis:
- You cannot romanticize anything bad.
- Anything I decide is romanticizing is romanticizing. Even if you argue otherwise.
- But it's ok if the media I like has a problematic relationship. Because it's not romanticizing, because I said so.
- You cannot age up that character, they are fictional do they'll always be a child.
- You also cannot ship that character, you have to treat them like a real person.
- Characters can't consent and we must protect them.
- Proshippers (real humans) we can treat poorly though.
- Proshippers are sexual harassers.
- But also, we can speculate about what their kinks are and if they have paraphilias or other fetish disorders.
- Cancel culture is totally cool.
- Don't cancel me for harassing proshippers though because it's okay when I do it.
Modern fandom went awry when people stopped learning how to avoid content that upsets them and instead starting actively seeking it out.
I mean this in the kindest, most loving way possible, but babes you'll be so much happy when you stop focusing on what other people are doing and instead focus on what you like.
You'll never be able to stop people from liking what you hate, and the best way you'll find any peace of mind is properly utilizing blocking, blacklisting, and muting tools. Take it from someone who used to run a shipping discourse blog, fandom is supposed to be what you enjoy, stop focusing on things that upset you.
Just kids bein’ kids
youtube link
someday I'll finish this cursed Hisoka x Netero madness.
Pony version of Fran Bow. Because why not?
Here's a big Fran Bow fanart which looks like a poster.
Anyways, hope you like it ❤
im SO glad i decided to watch the resident evil real time fandub
"I don't want to read this" is totally valid.
"This is disgusting to me" is totally valid.
"I don't want to read this because it is disgusting to me" is totally valid.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
You want more minority representation in media but if they have flaws its problematic and if theyre perfect theyre a patronizing mary sue. If they crack under the pressure of the conflict the author thinks that minority is weak and if they overcome the adversity they must be a neoliberal bootlicker who thinks real world bigotry is a matter of personal attitude. You want minority characters but if theyre a villain its violently problematic and if theyre the protagonist then we circle back to the very first sentence. If theyre a side character theyre being sidelined and the author is once again bigoted, and don't you know that every single minority character death is unilaterally bigoted, without exception? You want more minority characters but if their identity is a big part of their personality or struggles then they're problematic and if their identity has nothing to do with their personality or struggles then the author is tokenizing that identity for clout. You want more minority characters but every time theres a minority character who doesnt have every single experience that you have then you tell the author to kill themselves on twitter. You wonder why not even minority authors will write minority characters.
I would ask you to read Catch-22, but you'd just call the military base problematic.
Good for them