— Our Stances For This Account !
— our stances for this account !
we typically use the stance labels of oldqueer and hazardqueer.
this post will also include conversation of things that can possibly be triggering.
using the block button if something bothers you, unless it's valid to report. if it isn't grounds for a police report, just block someone instead of going to harass
here is also our full "shipcourse" stance, which is more of a rant than an explanation. this is for later in the list, but i'd rather put it here where more people will see it.
we are pro :
liom/mogai, and other microlabels, including ficto- and objectum (as well as posic)
contradictory labels
endogenic systems, created systems, and generally all system/plural origins
therians, otherkin, and alterhumans, including physical therians
alternative terms like chronosian, dissomei, desirdae, etc. as well as biid
self-diagnosis with extensive, informed research
being pro-active in your real-life communities if at all possible
reclamation of slurs that fit with yourself and your background
kink at pride events (as long as you keep yourself away from those who personally don't want to see it, or children)
paraphilias, and helping those with harmful or nonconsensual paraphilias that are trying to get help
supporting and seeing other peoples' viewpoints, as long as they are respectful, as well as nuanced conversation
supporting people and families from ukraine, palestine, the congo, and other countries that need freedom if you can financially
harm reduction, and the destigmatizing of people who use drugs
sex workers, and the people who rely on those kinds of jobs to survive in this economy and world
piracy and media preservation. we also hate billionaries
we are neutral on :
factkin (simply because we don't quite understand and haven't for a long time)
transids that do not include transitioning to another race, chronological age, disability/disorder, etc. (pretty much boils down to non-harmful transids. we think other terms are better, but we don't police language here)
the usage of "tulpa" as a term (we don't personally use it, and instead use thoughtform or other terms. however, again, we won't police your language)
syscourse (a lot of it is harmful. but a thoughtful, reasonable discussion of plural discourse is decent enough and sometimes needed to get your point across. just be kind to your fellow plurals)
we are against :
being rude to others for no reason
radqueers, xenosatanists, and harmful transids (including transharmful, transrace, transage, transabled, etc. this does not include transspecies)
consang/incest and beastiality in both real life and fiction (of course, people can write what they want to, but we are very against the romanticization of these things and absolutely prefer to not see it anywhere. to us, it's absolutely nasty and foul. and in real life, this shit is rightfully illegal! at least in america)
lolicon and shotacon material. refer to the anti-censorship thing, but to us, it doesn't matter if a child is fictional or not. those are still children, regardless whether they are real or not. if it "rids you of your urges," keep it offline. and especially keep it away from us
pro-contact for harmful or nonconsensual paraphilias including pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia, etc. and encouraging those types of paraphilias
most online censorship, although things such as csem, real-life gore (especially of children and animals), etc. need to be heavily monitored or outright removed. however, people can write what they want to write
terfs, radical feminists in general (even if they are "trans-inclusive"), "gender criticals," transmedicalists, system medicalists, and any group that focuses on gatekeeping and exclusivity
minors in kink or nsfw spaces online (for the safety of children online. we were heavily in those spaces when we were younger and it affected us for the worse. don't post nsfw if you are a minor — only keep your thoughts to friends around the same age as you that you know are comfortable with that type of conversation)
the idea of "personality disorder abuse." not all abusers are narcissists and not all narcissists are abusive. same thing with borderlines)
we will add more stances if needed, but this is it. this is going to be linked in our introduction post so it's easier to get to.
More Posts from Worldwidenoises and Others
A FUCKING PETITION /POS
YALL, THERES A PETITION TO REMOVE R/SYSCRINGE FROM REDDIT! LETS FUCKING GO!
THESE PEOPLE ARE SO MESSED UP, IVE EVEN SEEN ANTI-ENDOS REGARD THEM AS DISGUSTING. We can finally act now. Please sign the petition to remove r/syscringe.
We can stop them before they make the act to uncensor names and make their bullying worse.
i made a reddit post asking if i could use a cane without getting 'called out' for it (post stemmed from an argument with mom the night before, abt how basically she got mad and suddenly went on a tangent abt how were lazy and dont need a cane when it would likely assist with some possible disabilities) and i guess people downvoted our post? and i thought we would get support or something but people have been mostly questioning it since we are very unsure ourselves and it just feels like we shouldnt have made that post at all. only one person has been like 'if you need a cane, use it, no matter what someone else says' which is nice but the others have been questioning at best. and we didnt un-upvote our own stuff so we can tell others downvoted it. what the fuck even is reddit
like in our post i said it would help with possible cfs and pots, as well as breathing problems caused by excess exertion, flat-footed walking, and balance issues. i thought it would be obvious that i meant it wouldnt stop any of those but it would provide assistance but... i guess not? i thought it was obvious that a cane meant i could lean on it or something to provide just a little bit of relief for our feet and body but i guess it isnt obvious to the disability reddit. idk. like ik it wont stop any of those, but;
1. for fatigue and exertion-caused asthmatic issues it would provide me with a little bit of a rest spot since it isnt just my body doing all of the hard work
2. for the almost fainting of possible pots, a cane would let me lean on something without having the total possibility of falling, ive almost fell before because i havent had anything to lean on
3. with balance issues, same thing. it would probably allow me to trip over my own feet less. because 1, you have to be thoughtful abt walking with a cane. i know that damn well, and also it might let me hold on so i dont fall flat on my ass
4. and with my feet, it would relieve a bit of pressure i have on my feet when walking for long distances.
idk i guess reddit hates me (joking)
DEAR ALL SCAMMERS WHO POSE AS OLD RAGGEDY ASS SUGAR DADDIES GO KILL YOURSELVES I DON'T WANT A FUCKING MESSAGE OR A SINGLE FUCKING COMMENT FROM YOU GO FUCKING KILL YOUR WORTHLESS SELVES I'M A GODDAMN CHILD AND I'M TAKEN. GO FUCKING ROT IN THE JAIL CELL YOU DESERVE TO BE IN
anyways hi guys this DIRECTLY contradicts my fucking banner (positivity? haha not tonight!) but i want to not just crawl out of my skin. i want to rip it off! tear my organs to shreds! i want to KILL someone! i want to MAUL someone! tear someone to shreds! i want to rip my own body apart because the way i experience rage is so unique and i hate it! i hate it so fucking much and nobody UNDERSTANDS me. and nobody cares about me either! and god forbid my friends actually like. idk talk to me unless they need something. at least that's how it feels sometimes. I'M usually the one to reach out. do they hate me? am i too annoying and insane for all of them? probably! because fuck me i guess! might as well kill myself!
i'm not actually a suicide risk btw. this is hypothetical and overreacting.
Keep the flame going for those we have lost to suicide.
not many know this but you can actually headcanon neurodivergencies other than adhd and autism. yes, even the Big Scary disorders like DID, schizophrenia or narcissism. no, not only for villains. yes, for the main characters, the important characters, the characters that you love. yeah!!!
Pretend you didn't see that.
This is a level of transmisogyny that is somewhat hard to comment on because the things that one would normally point out as transmisogynistic implications are said so brazenly that there can be no pretense about any of the involved parties being unaware of it. The authors know, the readers know, everybody understands that this is pure transmisogyny. There is no plausible deniability.
It's an attempt to establish proximity between transfems and cis manhood in every way possible. Their bodies, their histories, their "socialization", the way they are treated by others, the way they treat and view others, their ways of thinking, even their self-conception. Every aspect of their being is cast as essentially male. Transfems are being called "men" in all but name - and not just any "men", they are made into embodiments of the worst aspects of hegemonic manhood. Not just male socialized but continuing to benefit from male socialization. Not just engaging in abusive behaviors stemming from male socialization but being afforded the freedom to do so because they continue to be treated as men. (Suffice it to say that this does not align with reality)
This is unadulterated sex-essentialism and it's intentionally being used to delegitimize and devalue the standpoint of transfems in feminist discourses. It's clear that the author is projecting transmisogynist ideas onto transfems and simply assumes that these ideas must be correct without considering any alternative. (The fact that transfems do not internalize "male socialization" has been reiterated many times over and should not have to be continually reasserted. This is a baseline level of understanding that we should be able to expect and demand from members of our community.)
Misogyny is framed as being contained within the realms of sexed bodies and gendered socialization in such a way that it allows for the casting of transfems as people enacting misogyny without being primary targets themselves - like cis men.
The claim that the animosity some transfems exhibit towards men comes from wanting to "prove" their womanhood serves the double purpose of casting their womanhood as inauthentic and denying the misogyny they suffer at the hands of men. One would be hard pressed to find a more cruel mischaracterization of transfems' experiences than this.
The cynical misappropriation of the standpoint of the people this screed is directed at by the use of "we" despite making it abundantly clear that the behavior that is being criticized and its supposed causes exempt people such as the author from the possibility of engaging in it should also be noted as an attempt at weaponizing a compromised version of standpoint epistemology against transfems.
The only plausible target audience for this kind of rhetoric are those who carry extreme ressentiment towards transfems and are susceptible to softened formulations of TERF ideology. These are the same kinds of ideas that TERFs have tried to push into trans spaces numerous times, e.g. under names like "sex-conscious feminsim".
A formulaic "retreat" from this post consisting entirely of platitudes has been published after the author received backlash for it but nobody is under any obligation to accept it and they absolutely should not. A person who was very obviously attempting to promote TERF ideology in trans spaces and in the same stroke accused transfems of being uniquely prone to making false accusations is not trustworthy, even if that person backs down upon realizing that the reception is more uniformly negative than anticipated.
@genderqueerdykes @gateway-2000 is a transmisogynist, beyond a shadow of a doubt. Its entire worldview is permeated by transmisogynistic assumptions, ideas and biases at a fundamental level. It has straightforwardly expressed an understanding of transfems' interiorities, their experiences and their social positions that is so incorrect that one has to wonder how someone holding these views could have navigated trans communities for a considerable amount of time without encountering the many transfeminist rebuttals to all of its demagoguery. How could someone with even a passing level of familiarity with TERF ideology or "gender critical feminism" read and espouse these ideas without recognizing them? It's completely unthinkable. It's not unreasonable to assume that it simply misjudged the consensus within its audience as being sufficiently anti-transfeminist for ideas such as these to fall upon fertile ground and it is now going back to waiting until the time is ripe to reintroduce them and to expressing them in more subtle ways until then.
But you can't un-ring a bell.
We can and should assert boundaries against reactionaries engaging in obvious subversion such as this. Refusing to do so is a deleterious error in judgement. This is very far beyond the limits of what any trans community that wants to consider transfems a part of itself can be allowed to tolerate.
when you see a good and relatable endo post but it's tagged as radqueer
hey pro-endo plurals, stop thinking about hate posts for a sec and let’s do a brain exercise. think about. a seagull.
yeah :)
he shouldve actually died in blue buried w no way of recovery i think ii wouldve been better off
-
miles-is-so-gay liked this · 2 months ago -
worldwidenoises reblogged this · 2 months ago
shi/hir, 17. autistic and mentally/neurologically disordered traumaendo system. previously known as riotmarrow. do not send dono asks. do not post us to fakedisordercringe or systemscringe. zios, radqueers, and darkshippers do not interact, we don't like you.
209 posts