Thank You For 7 Radical Years!

Goddamn. Okay

No more

Komaeda next.

Like to charge reblog to cast

im a white jew, i was born in israel,

ive lived there all my life and was brought up in an environment that fosters racism driven by nationalism, nationalism driven by racism.

in israel, they teach you jews and muslims (though usually, they just say arabs) have always been enemies, the same way the US deems the entire middle east as a inherent war zone, ridding them of the responsibility for perpetuating war in thst region.

they tell you "were the fair and humane side who strives for peace! its the arabs who never accept the offer!"

i remember the first time i began doubting that sentiment was in fourth grade, when we were having a discussion in class about the character of Saul from the Torah. the teacher was talking about how Saul, the first monarch of the Kingdom of Israel, used to fight the Philistines, and when she added that the Philistines were the natural enemy of the Israelites, she asked the class what group of people is their modern equivalent to which everyone very eagerly replied "Arabs!" and nevermind that there in that same class sat two arab boys, one of whom sat next to me, who i looked at and thought "but he isnt my enemy? hes just a boy in my class."

they teach you to hate arabs. sometimes they say it outright. sometimes they say it more carefully, or make a distinction between good and bad arabs, those who are with us and those who are against us.

in a state based on the idea of (white) jewish supremacy, they teach you jews are naturally superior. they use the conspiratorial narrative of "jews controlling the world" to their favor, giving their own watered down explanation for why antisemitism exists, saying that it must be driven by jealousy.

the zionist movement always used antisemitism to its advantage, either for reinforcing the notion of jewish supremacy or appealing to the real pain and trauma of generations, people who survived the holocaust, connecting them to stolen land where they are "guaranteed" safety ergo granting "justification" for the suffering of others.

its using peoples real pain that makes fear mongering so effective, and when the israeli population grows up being told all of their neighboring countries want to kill them, they quickly get defensive of the "only land where they can feel safe", but the only explanation ever provided for Why these neighboring countries are considered enemies is because theyre arabs.

and when it comes to palestine, it isnt even recognized as a country, nor identity. just a threat. ive talked to many people who are genuinely unaware of the occupation, and they arent willing to believe it either, because the media narrative has successfully shifted the blame on hamas. because "how could it be us? we want peace! its the terrorists who make us look bad! and their children, they grow up to be antisemites*, might as well get rid of them too!" they never stop to think what environment these children must grow up in to develop these "radical" ideas.

* what they mean by antisemite is really just antizionist, but the term anti/zionist isnt practiced in local dialect, being a zionist is treated as a given

any jew who stands against israels oppression is dubbed a self hating jew, but the biggest contributors to antisemitism is the people in charge of an ethnostate, because at any moment they could decide who is not white enough to be jewish, who is too jewish to be white, who stood against the current coalition government and who is an obedient dog.

israelis arent a monolith, but many of them have been won over, convinced its an "us v them" situation, when in reality it could never be the "us" that "loses"

the israeli government was waiting for an event like the massacre on the seventh of october to declare war, to have the so called "right to defend itself", so they could initiate the final steps of an ethnic genocide and displace, if not kill, all remaining palestinians. under the guise of bringing peace.

it isnt too late to call for a ceasefire.

please contact your representatives, attend protests and rallies if you are able. palestine will be free, and the flowers will rise again.

Hello I have gathered you here today for an important presentation. This is the most important and also funniest rabbithole since the queen dying.

By now you have all seen the evidence collected by several Twitter users in this tik tok of the fact that the new conservative TERF prime minister of the UK, Liz Truss, is collared as hell.

(content warning, there are news photos of violence against women later on)

After seeing this video, and some tweets by the hilarious @AliceAvizandum I have engaged in some further research surrounding the nature and circumstances of Truss's jewelry. I began on her Instagram, where I was able to ascertain a few facts about her necklaces. Firstly, her most commonly worn piece, as mentioned in the video, is this necklace:

She wears this in ~70% of the pictures she is in, and it is extremely obviously a submissive day collar. Compare these examples from fetish gear stores:

Personally, I believe it to be this one, from "tobehis.com" as it matches the fittings, chain weight, and size. Also, Liz Truss is a rich conservative and so would definitely buy a $300 version of a $30 item.

Another notable jewelry fact I learned is that, while she wears some non-collar necklaces, she wears them for a suspiciously long time. Most public facing individuals change their accessories out quite often, but Liz wore this necklace, for example, in EVERY PICTURE WHERE HER NECK WAS VISIBLE (probably around 50-70 pictures pictures) for a period of at least 6 months:

Compare the dates on these posts.

She also wore this necklace for Valentine's day, further supporting my suspicion that this necklace was in use as a more subtle day collar at this time:

It is possible this collar was in use much longer than that, as the January picture is the first one on her account where a necklace would be visible.

Initially, this other necklace threw me for a bit of a loop, as it does not match what would typically be expected from a day collar:

I initially thought it might be some kind of antler? But upon acquiring some higher quality paparazzi shots from a stock image site, the actual necklace became apparent. Computer, enhance!

It is not an antler. And I have seen it before. I am including a screenshot from the discord presentation I gave of this info.

Feel free to take a moment to process this. Okay good? Good.

These pieces by artist Leah Piepgras inspired a series of copies, most of which are one-off handmade items available only on Etsy and similar sites. Thus, I was unable to locate the specific item she is wearing, however, it is so obviously, blatantly a cumshot that she wears it with another necklace to disrupt its silhouette. I believe the other necklace is this one, based on these images. At $10 it is clearly one of the cheapest pieces available, furthering my suspicions that it was added as camouflage.

While researching the necklace, I found this article, which was published TODAY (sept 8 2022).

The Telegraph

Circle of Truss: the story behind Liz’s favourite necklace

For a politician famous for changing her mind, there’s the one thing our new Prime Minister will seemingly never change

The article is essentially pleasant supposition, and given that it was published by the telegraph, which has supported the UK conservative party since 1945, I believe it to be posted intentionally as an SEO smoke screen to bury the online discussions about the obvious collaring of the political leader of the UK during the queen's death 🦀. However, it did contain confirmation of some critical pieces of information that we all knew already:

Now, finally to the critical subject. The few photos available show her notably not wearing any necklace, something HIGHLY unusual for her:

Her husband is extremely private, with essentially no public information or assertion. Frankly, he seems a little bit boring, which is why she notably cheated on him for months back in 2005 with her conservative party "mentor" Mark Field. Mark Field is a man who is now notorious for his, shall we say "hands on" approach to women.

CONTENT WARNING: PHOTOS OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

the Guardian

Mark Field suspended as minister after grabbing climate protester by neck

Police investigate reports of assault as video shows Field forcefully removing woman

This woman was a protestor that he ejected from a formal event. However, his fascinating choice was the grab her in a one handed kink chokehold around the neck, which earned him a lot of bad press, a suspension, and a police investigation at the time.

I mean just look at this. He did this within moments of her arriving in the room with absolutely no hesitation.

(obviously this is very fucked up, but it is precisely the kind of aggro hetero kink dominance that is well associated with the conservative imagination)

In another instance less than 2 months later, he grabbed and kissed a colleague's wife hard on the mouth at a public event:

Grazia

As Boris Johnson Drops The Investigation Into Mark Field, Here’s A Really Uncomfortable Picture Of Him Kissing Jeremy Hunt’s Wife

An image of Mark Field kissing Lucia Hunt, Jeremy Hunt's wife, from Getty Images seems to show a pattern of inappropriate behaviour towards

After their lengthy affair, Mark Field's wife left him, but Liz Truss stayed with her husband to this day. This quote from this article is quite revealing.

This is my final piece of evidence, and it slots in nicely to form a powerfully compelling narrative:

Liz married shortly after joining the conservative party, flipping ideologically from lib-dem. It is likely that her husband shared her earlier politics more than her current ones, and this likely extended at the time to her perception of him as "unmanly" in the manner of typical conservative TERF gender essentialist brainrot, especially when compared to the hyper conservative and sexually aggressive Mark Field.

During her affair is likely when she became aware of her appreciation for D/S dynamics due to the unavoidable intensity of their relationship relative to that of her marriage, due both to Mark's tendency towards physicality, and his extreme position of authority over her.

Upon the revelation of the affair, she almost certainly justified it as a result of her unmet sexual needs in regards to power dynamics within her marriage. Her husband, now aware of her kink, proceeded to collar her, repairing both their commitment, and her perception of him. This explains the statements about their marriage becoming "a lot stronger" during this event, and it being a "powerful learning experience" for them.

In conclusion, while I am strongly against kink shaming, Piece of Shit in Chief, is not. Not only is she a rich, powerful, conservative bigot TERF, but she is the leader of the party that literally illegalized consent to rough sex in 2020! That includes facesitting!!!!

I really hope we all end up mocking her for it, (its pretty easy, watch this "Liz Trussed") and can only pray (desperately) that she doesn't get off on being Owned this publicly.

This concludes my presentation. Thank you for joining me for this incredible time in UK politics.

SEASONS GREASONS